Behavior & Development • Sep 19, 2011

The HPV Vaccine—Not for “Little Girls”

“To have innocent little 12-year-old girls be forced to have a government injection through an executive order is just flat out wrong. That should never be done. That’s a violation of a liberty interest.” – Rep. Michele Bachmann, during the September 7th republican presidential primary debate. 

Unfortunately, most 12-year-old girls are neither innocent nor little, and they do indeed need the HPV vaccine, Gardasil®.  First off, I do oppose mandating vaccination, in general.  But, by using the words “little” and “innocent,” Rep. Bachmann seems to imply that many 12-year-old girls may not need the vaccine.  The statistics speak otherwise. 

HPV, or the Human Papiloma Virus, is epidemic in the United States.  A recent study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that 24.5% of females in the United States aged 14 to 19 years are HPV positive.  Among women 20-24 years old, an astounding 44.8% were positive.[1]  HPV is everywhere.  And HPV is a nasty virus.  The consequences of HPV go far beyond cervical cancer.  It also causes anal, penile, and oral cancers.  It causes genital warts.  The therapy for HPV can cause “incompetent cervix,” or a weakened cervix that causes women to deliver babies prematurely.  Therapy for HPV is time-consuming, expensive, and truly unpleasant. 

Children and teens are contracting HPV at alarmingly young ages, many during their first sexual encounter.  Why?

  • We do not know how many men carry HPV.  It is difficult to test men for HPV, and most men with HPV are asymptomatic.  Men usually contract the disease and pass it on unknowingly.  Many young people think they are safe if their partner says they have never had any STDs and/or that they have had negative STD testing.  Not true for HPV.  Hence, males need the HPV vaccine, too.  Gardasil has been approved for use in males since 2009. 
  • Condoms aren’t great at preventing HPV transmission.  HPV can be carried in the pubic area at the base of the penis in men and around the vulva in women.  Just covering the shaft of the penis with a condom does not prevent transmission. 
  • HPV can be transmitted by hand-genital or oral-genital contact.  You do not need to have full-fledged intercourse to get HPV. 
  • HPV can be transmitted through sexual abuse and rape.

But what about the risks?  They are minimal and rare.  HPV is not rare, and the consequences of HPV are not minimal. 

So, let’s just say that your innocent little 12-year-old girl waits until marriage for her first sexual encounter.  She still has a very significant chance of contracting HPV from her spouse, even if he has had only one prior sexual partner, and even if he only had hand-genital contact with that partner.  And, statistically, her spouse probably will have had another partner.  According to a 2006 study, 75% of Americans have had pre-marital sex by age 20, and that number climbs to 95% by age 44.[2] 

So, let’s just say your innocent little 12-year-old girl is a statistical anomaly and manages to find herself a spouse who has never had any form of sexual contact with another partner.  She is still at risk of contracting HPV by rape. 

Yes, your innocent little 12-year-old girl, or boy, needs the HPV vaccine.  That’s the sad truth. 

[1] Dunne, E.F., et al.  Prevalence of HPV infection among females in the United States. JAMA. 2007;297(8):813.

[2] Finer L. Trends in premarital sex in the United States, 1954-2003. Public Health Reports, 2007; 23: 73.


  1. Well said! My son is under the age of 5 but as he gets older, if there’s evidence that Gardisil works for males to protect him from passing it along, I will have him get the vaccine too. I think we get too scared by sex – if there was a vaccine for lung cancer or breast cancer, everyone would be lining up for it.

  2. I am not for this vaccine at all. It has not be proven it even in any way stops HPV virus. Deaths have occurred in some girls also. It also has not be out long enough to proof it is safe. How many times do they rush getting vaccines and medication to the public only to find out it is not safe. I’m not against the vaccine I just think it needs to be tested longer before we have our daughters getting it. I’m sick to death of drug companies getting rich at the expense of human life!!!

Comments are closed.